Wednesday, October 08, 2008

The Year and a Day Rule

by Barbara D'Amato



Okay, no politics. Just something I think is interesting.

A mugger attacks his victim, bashing him with a crowbar and then rifling his pockets. Having taken the victim’s watch, money, charge cards, even his silk scarf and Lobb loafers, he worries that the victim will remember him and gives him another hard blow to the head to kill him.

However, his victim is not dead. Rushed to emergency care, his life is saved, but he has severe brain damage and is in a permanent coma. His assailant is arrested two days later, using the victim’s credit card. [As a cop friend of mine used to say, “If they were all geniuses, we wouldn’t catch them.”]

The attacker is tried and convicted of attempted murder, or grievous bodily harm, or assault with a deadly weapon – the actual charge will depend on the jurisdiction and the state attorney. But he is not tried for murder.

Two years later, the victim dies. What happens to the attacker?

English common law has long held that if the death occurs more than a year and a day after the attack, it was not murder. Until very recently, medical science was unable to keep people alive for long periods of time after a “murderous” attack. Now, of course, people can survive in a coma for years or decades on life support.

In the U.K. the law reform of 1996 abolished the year-and-a-day rule. In the United States, the situation is mixed. Several states have explicitly abolished it. But it survives because the common law underpinning of our laws survives.

Year-and-a-day goes way back. In Europe in the middle ages, if a serf ran away from his master and could keep from being captured for a year and a day, he became a free man. In many parts of the U.S., year-and-a-day is tied to the definition of certain crimes. A misdemeanor may carry a sentence of less that a year and a day, often phrased as eleven months and twenty-nine days. A felony is punished by more than a year and a day.

Because of the difference between states on this, and because even in states that have abolished the rule, cases are still successfully argued against charging a person with murder when the victim lives more than a year and a day, there are rich veins here for a crime novelist to mine.

4 comments:

Dana King said...

I was thinking, "Interesting, but so what?" until the last sentence. Here's an opportunity to write a story where someone is beaten (shot, stabbed, take your pick) and in a coma. The killer knows he's going to be caught, and tries everything to keep the victim alive, but the friend/family/state's attorney, who knows the victim is pretty much a vegetable, actually has incentive to speed along the inevitable in order to exact the fullest measure of legal action.

It would take someone very good to write this, or it could come off as cartoonish, but the potential is there.

This line of thought can lead to quite a few clever ideas. Good post.

jnantz said...

Okay, this is just weird...or divine providence. I'm tooling around checking crime-writer blogs (solo and group), and I come upon a title that has special meaning to me.

In THE CANTERBURY TALES, the Wife of Bath's tale allows for the rapist knight to search for a year and a day to find the answer to Queen Guinevere's question in order to save his life. In SIR GAWAIN AND THE GREEN KNIGHT, Gawain has a year and a day to find the Green Chapel and receive the return blow from G.K.'s axe. Both Arthurian legends, both a year and a day.

And my students always wanted to know why, and I could never find anything specific to Arthurian Legends. Of course, it never occured to me to just search common law in G.B. Thanks for pointing this out, since we're studying those two topics RIGHT NOW.

Like I said, weird. Thank you!

Barbara D'Amato said...

jnantz--glad this helped.

dana, yes, the year and a day rule is fertile with possibilities. For instance, if a person lives a LONG time, most prosecutors are leery of trying the case. So if you're a suspect in the attack and a relative, get the best care for the patient you can. If you are a dishonest but headline-seeking prosecutor, hastening things along is a possibility. If you are a family member wanting full revenge, find a sub-standard care facility. Oh, gee. Crime writers do claw around in the muck, don't we?

hermes 35cm birkin said...

Nice sharing with us such a good post thanks.